I
have completed the first Booker book, P.H. Newby's Something to Answer For (1969)!
It
is the story of Jack Townrow, of somewhere in the U.K., who returns to Port
Said just before the Suez Canal crisis. Townrow has been getting letters from
the widow of an old friend from his Army days in Egypt, Mrs. Khoury. Seems Mr.
Elie Khoury is dead -- and his wife suspects murder. Townrow thinks he can persuade
Mrs. K to return to England, where she is from, and gain some of her wealth in
the bargain. Perhaps Mrs. K’s personal crisis is meant to parallel the
political one: the marriage of an English cockney woman to a Lebanese merchant
could represent the uneasy collaboration between Europe and the Middle East over
the Suez Canal, into which is added a greedy, meddling Brit.
Shortly
after Townrow's return, he is hit on the head and wakes up naked in the desert.
After this point, he becomes a completely unreliable narrator: he can't
remember his nationality, and at times he’s not exactly sure who he is. He even
commits the Orion Error.1 He then falls in love with a Jewish woman,
and is accused of being a spy for Israel.
Townrow
(whose name I kept misreading as Tomorrow throughout the book – symbolic? or
just me?) seems to stand for the naïve Brit who assumes his country always does
the right thing. This motif is introduced early, when Townrow meets a Jew in
the airport on his way to Egypt. They debate whether the British did or could
have warned Jews not to get on the trains to the death camps. Finally, the Jew
says, “Just because you’re a nice guy yourself, it doesn’t mean you’ve got a
nice government.” Later, Townrow, whose mother is Irish and whose father (who
abandoned them) is English, says, “What was an Irishman but a sort of Jew?”
The comparison reminds me of the scene from the excellent film “The Commitments,” when the
band leader tries to persuade the white Irish musicians that they have every
right to play the blues, telling them that “the Irish are the blacks of Europe,”
and to repeat after him: “I’m black and I’m proud.” The latter comparison makes
more sense to me; sadly, the Jews have been feared for their supposed power and
wealth, while the Irish and blacks have been despised for their lack of both. (Oh, and if you click on "The Commitments" link, that's a young Glen Hansard of "Once" sitting in the center!)
However,
the trope of the amnesic, confused, unreliable protagonist in a “vertiginous”
situation only takes you so far. It doesn’t appeal to me as a plot device; it
seems cliched. Perhaps it wasn’t yet in 1969? I am reminded of the unsolved
mysteries and general paranoia of Pynchon’s The
Crying of Lot 49, or Patrick Modiano’s Rue
des Boutiques Obscures (Missing
Person, in English). I guess I like my mysteries Goldilocks-medium. I don’t
enjoy the nice, neat packages of mystery novels, tied up neatly with a bow of
motive and opportunity. I am a Post-Modernist gal, so I can take a certain dose
of ambiguity; but this type of novel, which seems so incomplete, grates on my
nerves as well.
Finally,
Townrow realizes “[y]ou couldn’t answer for anything outside your own personal
experience. And if you remembered your own experiences wrongly, you didn’t count
at all. You weren’t human.” I remember, therefore I am. He comes to cherish his
conscience and honor, but just as I was starting to like him, he makes the
ridiculous statement that women don’t understand honor. Sigh. What do you
think? Can you like a book that dismisses women so sweepingly?
1The Orion Error is one of my biggest literary pet peeves. The constellation
Orion is a favorite among writers, perhaps because it is so recognizable. The
problem is that in the Northern hemisphere (where Egypt is), Orion is only
visible in winter – while the scene where Townrow sees Orion directly overhead takes
place in summer. Trust me, I’ve researched this thoroughly. My husband even used
this site to look up what the sky looked like during July 1956 in Egypt.
But I’ve read at least three other works in which characters in the Northern hemisphere see Orion in summer. It’s jarring, and
makes me wonder what other details the author has gotten wrong. At least in
this case, Townrow doesn’t even know exactly who he is, so we can dismiss the
error as faulty memory.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete